USA v. Ernesto Rojas-Macia
Filing
UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [16-41579 Dismissed as Frivolous] Judge: EGJ , Judge: PEH , Judge: JWE. Mandate pull date is 09/08/2017 for Appellant Ernesto Rojas-Macias; granting motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Mr. Scott Andrew Martin [8450893-2] [16-41579]
Case: 16-41579
Document: 00514121875
Page: 1
Date Filed: 08/18/2017
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-41579
Conference Calendar
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
August 18, 2017
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
v.
ERNESTO ROJAS-MACIAS,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 5:15-CR-1489-1
Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Ernesto RojasMacias has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632
F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Rojas-Macias has not filed a response. We have
reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected
therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
*
Case: 16-41579
Document: 00514121875
Page: 2
Date Filed: 08/18/2017
No. 16-41579
nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave
to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities
herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?