USA v. Baldomero Gonzalez-Ramirez

Filing

UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [16-50224 Dismissed as Frivolous] Judge: WED, Judge: EBC, Judge: GJC. Mandate pull date is 10/10/2017; granting motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Ms. Laura G. Greenberg [8373036-2] [16-50224]

Download PDF
Case: 16-50224 Document: 00514159743 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/18/2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 16-50224 Summary Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED September 18, 2017 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. BALDOMERO GONZALEZ-RAMIREZ, also known as Juan GonzalezRamirez, also known as Ivan Gonzalez, also known as Antonio De La Cruz, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:09-CR-1267-1 Before DAVIS, CLEMENT, and COSTA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Baldomero Gonzalez-Ramirez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Gonzalez-Ramirez has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. * Case: 16-50224 Document: 00514159743 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/18/2017 No. 16-50224 reflected therein, as well as Gonzalez-Ramirez’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?