USA v. Sandra Tejada

Filing

UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [16-50340 Dismissed as Frivolous] Judge: JES , Judge: EBC , Judge: GJC. Mandate pull date is 07/11/2017; granting motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Mr. Ray Ray Velarde [8282789-2] [16-50340]

Download PDF
Case: 16-50340 Document: 00514040118 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/20/2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 16-50340 Conference Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED June 20, 2017 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. SANDRA TEJADA, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:04-CR-736-1 Before SMITH, CLEMENT, and COSTA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Sandra Tejada has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Tejada has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. * Case: 16-50340 Document: 00514040118 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/20/2017 No. 16-50340 Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?