USA v. Francisco Millan-Madrid
Filing
UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [17-10116 Dismissed as Frivolous] Judge: PEH, Judge: EHJ, Judge: JES. Mandate pull date is 10/05/2017 for Appellant Francisco Millan-Madrid; granting motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Mr. James Patrick Whalen [8488685-2] [17-10116]
Case: 17-10116
Document: 00514156176
Page: 1
Date Filed: 09/14/2017
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-10116
Summary Calendar
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
September 14, 2017
Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff−Appellee,
versus
FRANCISCO MILLAN-MADRID,
Defendant−Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 3:15-CR-307-5
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The attorney appointed to represent Francisco Millan-Madrid has moved
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
*
Case: 17-10116
Document: 00514156176
Page: 2
Date Filed: 09/14/2017
No. 17-10116
for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.
2011). Millan-Madrid has not filed a response.
We have reviewed counsel’s brief and relevant portions of the record. We
concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous
issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is
GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?