USA v. Juan Garcia-Garcia

Filing

UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [17-20033 Dismissed as Frivolous] Judge: CDK, Judge: PRO, Judge: SAH. Mandate issue date is 11/15/2017 for Appellant Juan Jose Garcia-Garcia; granting motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Mr. Michael Lance Herman [8464539-2] [17-20033]

Download PDF
Case: 17-20033 Document: 00514207459 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/24/2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 17-20033 Conference Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 24, 2017 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee Lyle W. Cayce Clerk v. JUAN JOSE GARCIA-GARCIA, also known as Juan Garcia-Garcia, also known as Juan J. Garcia, also known as Juan Jose Garcia, also known as Juan Jose Garcia Garica, also known as Juan Garcia Garcia, also known as Jose J. Garcia-Garcia, also known as Juan Jose Garcia Garcia, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:13-CR-210-1 Before KING, OWEN, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Juan Jose GarciaGarcia has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Garcia-Garcia has not filed a response. We have Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. * Case: 17-20033 Document: 00514207459 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/24/2017 No. 17-20033 reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?