USA v. Juan Garcia-Garcia
Filing
UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [17-20033 Dismissed as Frivolous] Judge: CDK, Judge: PRO, Judge: SAH. Mandate issue date is 11/15/2017 for Appellant Juan Jose Garcia-Garcia; granting motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Mr. Michael Lance Herman [8464539-2] [17-20033]
Case: 17-20033
Document: 00514207459
Page: 1
Date Filed: 10/24/2017
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-20033
Conference Calendar
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
October 24, 2017
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
v.
JUAN JOSE GARCIA-GARCIA, also known as Juan Garcia-Garcia, also
known as Juan J. Garcia, also known as Juan Jose Garcia, also known as Juan
Jose Garcia Garica, also known as Juan Garcia Garcia, also known as Jose J.
Garcia-Garcia, also known as Juan Jose Garcia Garcia,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:13-CR-210-1
Before KING, OWEN, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Juan Jose GarciaGarcia has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632
F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Garcia-Garcia has not filed a response. We have
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
*
Case: 17-20033
Document: 00514207459
Page: 2
Date Filed: 10/24/2017
No. 17-20033
reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected
therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no
nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave
to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities
herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?