USA v. Juan Luna


UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [17-20201 Dismissed as Frivolous] Judge: TMR, Judge: ECP, Judge: JEG. Mandate issue date is 04/30/2018 for Appellant Juan Andres Luna; granting Motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Ms. Yolanda Evette Jarmon, Esq. [8629295-2] [17-20201]

Download PDF
Case: 17-20201 Document: 00514418585 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/06/2018 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 17-20201 Summary Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED April 6, 2018 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. JUAN ANDRES LUNA, also known as Juan Andre Luna, also known as Juan Luna, also known as Juan Luna Mendez, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:16-CR-478-1 Before REAVLEY, PRADO, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges. 1 PER CURIAM: 2 The attorney appointed to represent Juan Andres Luna has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Luna has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the This opinion was concurred in by Judge Prado prior to his retirement from the court on April 2, 2018. 1 Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. 2 Case: 17-20201 Document: 00514418585 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/06/2018 No. 17-20201 relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?