USA v. Aurelio Monte

Filing

UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [17-50268 Dismissed as Frivolous 17-50269 Dismissed as Frivolous] Judge: CDK , Judge: PRO , Judge: SAH. Mandate issue date is 11/15/2017 for Appellants Aurelio Olmedo Montes and Aurelio Olmedo-Montes; granting motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Ms. Judy Fulmer Madewell [8511760-2] [17-50268, 17-50269]

Case: 17-50268

Document: 00514208268

Page: 1

Date Filed: 10/24/2017

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-50268
Conference Calendar

United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit

FILED
October 24, 2017

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk

Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
AURELIO OLMEDO MONTES,
Defendant-Appellant
Cons. w/ No. 17-50269
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
AURELIO OLMEDO-MONTES, also known as Lelo Montes, also known as
Juan Monteroz-Montez, also known as Adrian Montez, also known as Adrian
Montes, also known as Adrian Montes-McCrary, also known as Aurelio
Olemedo Montes, also known as Lelo Montez, also known as Lelo OlmedoMontes,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeals from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. 1:17-CR-121-1
USDC No. 1:17-CR-4-1

Case: 17-50268

Document: 00514208268

Page: 2

Date Filed: 10/24/2017

No. 17-50268
c/w No. 17-50269
Before KING, OWEN, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Aurelio Olmedo
Montes has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632
F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Olmedo Montes has not filed a response. We have
reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected
therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeals present no
nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave
to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities
herein, and the APPEALS ARE DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
*

2