Nevarez Law Firm, P.C. v. Dona Ana Title Company, et al


UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [17-50343 Affirmed] Judge: PEH, Judge: EHJ, Judge: JES. Mandate issue date is 11/15/2017; denying motion to supplement the record on appeal filed by Appellant Nevarez Law Firm, P.C. and Intervenor Mr. Michael R. Nevarez [8575541-2] [17-50343]

Download PDF
Case: 17-50343 Document: 00514208464 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/24/2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 17-50343 Summary Calendar NEVAREZ LAW FIRM, P.C., United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 24, 2017 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Plaintiff - Appellant MICHAEL R. NEVAREZ Intervenor v. J. L. R., A Minor; JOSE LUIS ROJAS, also known as Jose Rojas, also known as Jose Rodriguez, also known as Jose Luis Rodriguez, also known as Jose L. Rojas; ARTEMIO JAYME; VIVIANA JAYME; MARCO AURELIO JAYME; M. J., A Minor; G. J., A Minor; TATIANA JAYME, Defendants - Appellees Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3-15-CV-297 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. * Case: 17-50343 Document: 00514208464 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/24/2017 No. 17-50343 The court has carefully considered this appeal in light of the briefs, oral argument, and pertinent portions of the record. Having done so, we find no error of law or reversible error of fact. The district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED for essentially the same reasons articulated by that court. Motion to supplement the record DENIED. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?