Patricia Reed v. Madison County, Mississippi
Filing
UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [17-60433 Affirmed ] Judge: JLW , Judge: JLD , Judge: LHS Mandate issue date is 12/13/2017 [17-60433]
Case: 17-60433
Document: 00514245352
Page: 1
Date Filed: 11/21/2017
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-60433
Summary Calendar
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
November 21, 2017
Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
PATRICIA REED,
Plaintiff-Appellant
v.
MADISON COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI,
Defendant-Appellee
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Mississippi
USDC No. 3:16-CV-51
Before WIENER, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Plaintiff-Appellant Patricia Reed, an African-American formerly
employed by the detention center operated by Defendant-Appellee Madison
County, Mississippi, appeals the summary judgment of the district court that
dismissed Reed’s claim of racial discrimination in her firing. Reed’s appeal is
based on her assertion of pretext in the County’s denial of racial discrimination
in hiring a Caucasian to replace Reed. The district court determined that there
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
*
Case: 17-60433
Document: 00514245352
Page: 2
Date Filed: 11/21/2017
No. 17-60433
was no genuine issue of material fact in Reed’s claim of pretext and granted
the County’s Motion for Summary Judgment, dismissing Reed’s action.
We have now reviewed the record on appeal, including the briefs of the
parties and the district court’s extensive Opinion and Order of May 9, 2017,
and we are satisfied that the district court’s reasoning and conclusion are not
merely free of error, but support its Final Judgment dismissing Reed’s action
with prejudice. We affirm that judgment for essentially the same reasons set
forth in the district court’s Opinion and Order.
AFFIRMED.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?