John Ramirez v. Lorie Davis, Director

Filing

UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [17-70005 Affirmed ] Judge: CDK , Judge: EBC , Judge: PRO; denying motion to vacate the stay of execution filed by Appellant Ms. Lorie Davis, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division [8414557-2] [17-70005]

Download PDF
Case: 17-70005 Document: 00513859325 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/01/2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 17-70005 JOHN H. RAMIREZ, Petitioner - Appellee v. LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION, Respondent - Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:12-CV-410 Before KING, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* John Ramirez is scheduled to be executed by the State of Texas on February 2, 2017. On January 27, 2017, Ramirez filed two motions in the district court: (1) a motion to stay the execution; and (2) a motion for the appointment of new counsel pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3599. After holding a hearing on January 31, 2017, the district court granted the motion to stay the Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. * Case: 17-70005 Document: 00513859325 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/01/2017 No. 17-70005 execution and provisionally granted the motion for the appointment of new counsel. The State has filed a motion to vacate the stay of execution in this court. Reviewing the grant of the stay for abuse of discretion, we find no reversible error on the part of the district court. See, e.g., Adams v. Thaler, 679 F.3d 312, 318 (5th Cir. 2012). Moreover, the district court did not lack jurisdiction under these circumstances to grant the stay. Battaglia v. Stephens, 824 F.3d 470, 475–76 (5th Cir. 2016) (per curiam). Motion to vacate stay of execution is DENIED. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?