Sutton v. Bell


OPINION and JUDGMENT filed: District court's denial of habeas relief is AFFIRMED, decision for publication pursuant to local rule 206. Boyce F. Martin, Jr. (DISSENTING), Danny J. Boggs (AUTHORING), Martha Craig Daughtrey (CONCURRING IN THE REASONING AND THE RESULT OF THE MAJORITY), Circuit Judges.

Download PDF
Case: 03-5058 Document: 006110979682 Filed: 06/08/2011 Page: 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT Leonard Green Clerk 100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540 POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988 Tel. (513) 564-7000 Filed: June 08, 2011 Messrs Stephen A. Ferrell, Stephen M. Kissinger Federal Defender Services of Eastern Tennessee, Inc. 800 S. Gay Street, Suite 2400 Knoxville, TN 37929 Mr. Joseph Frederick Whalen III Office of the Tennessee Attorney General P.O. Box 20207 Nashville, TN 37202 Re: Case No. 03-5058, Sutton v. Bell Originating Case No. 00-00013 Dear Counsel, The court today announced its decision in the above-styled case. Enclosed is a copy of the court's opinion together with the judgment which has been entered in conformity with Rule 36, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Yours very truly, Leonard Green, Clerk Linda K. Martin Deputy Clerk Enclosures Mandate to issue.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?