Sutton v. Bell
OPINION and JUDGMENT filed: District court's denial of habeas relief is AFFIRMED, decision for publication pursuant to local rule 206. Boyce F. Martin, Jr. (DISSENTING), Danny J. Boggs (AUTHORING), Martha Craig Daughtrey (CONCURRING IN THE REASONING AND THE RESULT OF THE MAJORITY), Circuit Judges.
Case: 03-5058 Document: 006110979682 Filed: 06/08/2011 Page: 1
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540
POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE
CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988
Tel. (513) 564-7000
Filed: June 08, 2011
Messrs Stephen A. Ferrell, Stephen M. Kissinger
Federal Defender Services of Eastern Tennessee, Inc.
800 S. Gay Street, Suite 2400
Knoxville, TN 37929
Mr. Joseph Frederick Whalen III
Office of the Tennessee Attorney General
P.O. Box 20207
Nashville, TN 37202
Re: Case No. 03-5058, Sutton v. Bell
Originating Case No. 00-00013
The court today announced its decision in the above-styled case.
Enclosed is a copy of the court's opinion together with the judgment which has been entered
in conformity with Rule 36, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.
Yours very truly,
Leonard Green, Clerk
Linda K. Martin
Mandate to issue.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?