Kidd v. Airborne Express

Filing 920061101

Opinion

Download PDF
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION File Name: 06a0805n.06 Filed: November 1, 2006 No. 06-5146 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT CHESTER KIDD Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AIRBORNE EXPRESS, INC., a/k/a Airborne Freight Corporation; DHL EXPRESS (USA), INC., a/k/a DHL Worldwide Express, Inc. Defendants-Appellees. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE Before: MARTIN and COOK, Circuit Judges; and BUNNING, District Judge.* PER CURIAM. Chester Kidd appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment for Airborne Express. Having reviewed the record and the applicable law, and having the benefit of oral argument and the parties' briefs, we determine that no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a panel opinion and affirm the district court's decision for the reasons stated in that court's opinion. We will not consider Kidd's argument, raised for the first time on appeal, that the test announced in Christian v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 252 F.3d 862 (6th Cir. 2001), governs his case. The Honorable David L. Bunning, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Kentucky, sitting by designation. *

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?