USA v. Jack

Filing 920070815

Opinion

Download PDF
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION File Name: 07a0592n.06 Filed: August 15, 2007 No. 06-5925 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. WILLIE JACK, Defendant-Appellant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE Before: KENNEDY and COOK, Circuit Judges; and ALDRICH, District Judge.* PER CURIAM. Having reviewed the parties' briefs and joint appendix, the court affirms the judgment of the district court as the record fails to demonstrate unreasonableness in Willie Jack's sentence. We note the district court's: sufficient review of the 3553(a) factors relevant to a revocation of supervised release pursuant to 3583(e); correct application of the Guidelines (Jack's misunderstanding of U.S.S.G. 7B1.4 Application Notes, n. 3 notwithstanding); and the absence of improper judicial fact-finding, as confirmed by Jack's revocation-hearing admission to violating certain conditions of supervised release. Judgment affirmed. The Honorable Ann Aldrich, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Ohio, sitting by designation. * -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?