Donald Molosky, et al v. Washington Mutual, Incorporate, et al
OPINION and JUDGMENT filed: judgment of the district court with respect to the contract claim regarding the statement payoff fee is REVERSED and the case is REMANDED, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED in all other respects, decision for publication pursuant to local rule 206. Karen Nelson Moore, John M. Rogers (AUTHORING), Circuit Judges and Joseph M. Hood, U.S. District Judge for the E. D. of KY.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
DONALD J. MOLOSKY; ELIZABETH A. MOLOSKY,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
Dec 22, 2011
LEONARD GREEN, Clerk
WASHINGTON MUTUAL, INCORPORATED;
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION,
Defendants - Appellees.
Before: MOORE and ROGERS, Circuit Judges; HOOD, District Judge.
On Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Michigan at Detroit.
THIS CAUSE was heard on the record from the district court and was argued by
IN CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, it is ORDERED that the judgment of the district
court with respect to the contract claim regarding the payoff statement fee is REVERSED
and the case is REMANDED for further consideration in light of the opinion of this court.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED in all
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
Leonard Green, Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?