Archie Dixon v. Marc Houk


OPINION and JUDGMENT filed: The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED and Dixon's petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED. Decision for publication. Gilbert S. Merritt (DISSENTING), Eugene E. Siler, Jr. (AUTHORING), and R. Guy Cole, Jr., Circuit Judges.

Download PDF
Case: 08-4019 Document: 006111813259 Filed: 09/10/2013 Page: 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT 100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540 POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988 Deborah S. Hunt Clerk Tel. (513) 564-7000 Filed: September 10, 2013 Mr. Michael J. Benza Law Office of Michael J. Benza 17850 Geauga Lake Road Chagrin Falls, OH 44023 Mr. Thomas E. Madden Mr. Stephen E. Maher Office of the Ohio Attorney General 150 E. Gay Street, 16th Floor Columbus, OH 43215 Mr. Lawrence J. Whitney Burdon & Merlitti 137 S. Main Street, Suite 201 Akron, OH 44308 Re: Case No. 08-4019, Archie Dixon v. Marc Houk Originating Case No. : 3:05-cv-1290 Dear Counsel, The court today announced its decision in the above-styled case. Enclosed is a copy of the court's opinion together with the judgment which has been entered in conformity with Rule 36, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Yours very truly, Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk Cathryn Lovely Deputy Clerk Case: 08-4019 cc: Geri M. Smith Enclosures Mandate to issue. Document: 006111813259 Filed: 09/10/2013 Page: 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?