Mark Miller, et al v. City of Cincinnati, et al
OPINION and JUDGMENT filed: District court's order is AFFIRMED, case is REMANDED, decision for publication pursuant to local rule 206. Martha Craig Daughtrey (AUTHORING), R. Guy Cole, Jr., Julia Smith Gibbons, Circuit Judges.
Case: 08-4679 Document: 006110741531 Filed: 09/24/2010 Page: 1
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS F O R THE SIXTH CIRCUIT N o . 08-4679
Sep 24, 2010
LEONARD GREEN, Clerk
M A R K MILLER; COALITION OPPOSED TO ADDITIONAL SPENDING & TAXES; and WEDEMANDAVOTE.COM, P laintiffs - Appellees, v. C IT Y OF CINCINNATI; MILTON R. DOHONEY; and JOEL KOOPMAN, Defendants - Appellants. Before: DAUGHTREY, COLE, and GIBBONS, Circuit Judges.
O n Appeal from the United States District Court fo r the Southern District of Ohio at Cincinnati. T H IS CAUSE was heard on the record from the district court and was argued by c o u n se l. IN CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, it is ORDERED that the order of the district court is AFFIRMED and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with the opinion of this court. E N T E R E D BY ORDER OF THE COURT
L eo n ard Green, Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?