Frank Nali v. Thomas Phillips

Filing

OPINION and JUDGMENT filed; The district court's order unconditionally granting Nali's petition for a writ of habeas corpus is REVERSED. The district court's order vacating and setting aside Nali's conviction for extortion and its order directing Warden Thomas Phillps to release Nali from custody are REVERSED. The district court's denial of habeas corpus relief on Nali's ineffective assistance-of-counsel claim is AFFIRMED. The case is REMANDED to the district court for an entry of an order in compliance with this decision. Decision for publication pursuant to local rule 206. Karen Nelson Moore and Julia Smith Gibbons, Circuit Judge; Arthur L. Alarcon, Senior Circuit Judge of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, sitting by designation. [09-1876, 09-1960]

Download PDF
Case: 09-1876 Document: 006111327458 Filed: 06/06/2012 Page: 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT Nos. 09-1876/1960 FILED FRANK NALI, Petitioner- Appellee/Cross-Appellant, Jun 06, 2012 LEONARD GREEN, Clerk v. THOMAS PHILLIPS, Warden, Respondent - Appellant/Cross-Appellee. Before: MOORE, GIBBONS, and ALARCÓN, Circuit Judges. JUDGMENT On Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan at Detroit. THIS CAUSE was heard on the record from the district court and was argued by counsel. IN CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, it is ORDERED that the district court’s order unconditionally granting Nali’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus is REVERSED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the district court’s order vacating and setting aside Nali’s conviction for extortion and its order directing Warden Thomas Phillips to release Nali from custody are REVERSED. The district court’s denial of habeas corpus relief on Nali’s ineffective assistance-of-counsel claim is AFFIRMED. The case is REMANDED to the district court for entry of an order in compliance with this decision. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT Leonard Green, Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?