Mary-Jo Hyldahl v. Michigan Bell Telephone Compan

Filing

OPINION filed : We AFFIRM the district court's denial of Michigan Bell's motions for directed verdict and new trial, and uphold the award of liquidated damages, decision not for publication pursuant to local rule 206. Danny J. Boggs, Circuit Judge; Helene N. White, (Authoring) Circuit Judge and William O. Bertelsman, U.S. District Judge for the Eastern District of Kentucky, sitting by designation.

Case: 09-2087

Document: 006111484479

Filed: 10/31/2012

Page: 1

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540
POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE
CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988

Deborah S. Hunt
Clerk

Tel. [phone]
www.ca6.uscourts.gov

Filed: October 31, 2012
Ms. Julie A. Gafkay
Law Offices
160 S. Main Street
Suite 4
Frankenmuth, MI 48734
Ms. Katherine S. Gardner
Gafkay & Gardner
175 S. Main Street
Frankenmuth, MI 48734
Ms. Laura A. Lindner
Littler Mendelson
111 E. Kilbourn Avenue
Suite 1000
Milwaukee, WI 53202
Re:

Case No. 09-2087, Mary-Jo Hyldahl v. Michigan Bell Telephone
Compan
Originating Case No. : 07-14948

Dear Counsel:
The Court issued the enclosed Opinion today in this case.
Sincerely yours,
s/Karen S. Fultz
Case Manager
Direct Dial No. 513-564-7036
cc: Mr. David J. Weaver
Enclosure
Mandate to issue