Ben Upton v. City of Royal Oak, et al


OPINION filed: The grant of summary judgment to Defendants on Upton's procedural due process claim, municipal liability claim and civil conspiracy claim is AFFIRMED. The grant of summary judgment on Upton's First Amendment retaliation claim, is REVERSED, the grant of summary judgment to the individual Defendants on immunity grounds is VACATED and REMANDED, decision not for publication pursuant to local rule 206. Eugene E. Siler , Jr.; John M. Rogers and Helene N. White, (authoring) Circuit Judges.

Download PDF
Case: 10-2304 Document: 006111302923 Filed: 05/11/2012 Page: 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT 100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540 POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988 Leonard Green Clerk Tel. (513) 564-7000 Filed: May 11, 2012 Mr. Jamil Akhtar Law Office 7577 U.S. Highway 12 Suite B Onsted, MI 49265 Mr. Joseph Nimako Cummings, McClorey, Davis & Acho 33900 Schoolcraft Livonia, MI 48150 Re: Case No. 10-2304, Ben Upton v. City of Royal Oak, et al Originating Case No. : 08-13995 Dear Counsel: The Court issued the enclosed (Order/Opinion) today in this case. Sincerely yours, s/Patricia J. Elder Senior Case Manager Direct Dial No. 513-564-7034 cc: Mr. David J. Weaver Enclosure Mandate to issue

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?