Mirna Serrano, et al v. Cintas Corporation
Filing
OPINION and JUDGMENT filed : Both judgments of the district court at issue in the present appeals are VACATED, and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings. Decision for publication. Karen Nelson Moore (AUTHORING), Julia Smith Gibbons (CONCURRING IN PART AND DISSENTING IN PART), and Arthur L. Alarcon, Circuit Judges. The Honorable Arthur L. Alarcon, Senior Circuit Judge for the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, sitting by designation. [10-2629, 11-2057]
Case: 10-2629
Document: 006111495257
Filed: 11/09/2012
Page: 1
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540
POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE
CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988
Deborah S. Hunt
Clerk
Tel. (513) 564-7000
www.ca6.uscourts.gov
Filed: November 09, 2012
Ms. Jennifer S. Goldstein
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Office of General Counsel
131 M Street, N.E.
Washington, DC 20507
Ms. Rachael A. Rowe
Mr. Gregory M. Utter
Keating, Muething & Klekamp
One E. Fourth Street, Suite 1400
Cincinnati, OH 45202
Re: Case Nos. 10-2629/11-2057, Mirna Serrano, et al v. Cintas Corporation
Originating Case Nos. : 2:04-cv-40132 ; 2:06-cv-12311
Dear Counsel,
The court today announced its decision in the above-styled cases.
Enclosed is a copy of the court's opinion together with the judgment which has been entered
in conformity with Rule 36, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.
Yours very truly,
Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk
Cathryn Lovely
Deputy Clerk
cc: Mr. David J. Weaver
Enclosures
Mandate to issue.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?