Brandy Andler v. Clear Channel Broadcasting, In, et al
OPINION and JUDGMENT filed: AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, jury's award is VACATED, case is REMANDED for a partial new trial on the issue of damages; decision for publication pursuant to local rule 206. Boyce F. Martin, Jr., Karen Nelson Moore (AUTHORING), Deborah L. Cook, Circuit Judges. [10-3264, 10-3266]
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
Nos. 10-3264; 10-3266
Feb 29, 2012
Plaintiff - Appellant/Cross-Appellee,
LEONARD GREEN, Clerk
CLEAR CHANNEL BROADCASTING, INC.,
Defendant - Appellee/Cross-Appellant.
Before: MARTIN, MOORE, and COOK, Circuit Judges.
On Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Ohio at Columbus.
THIS CAUSE was heard on the record from the district court and was argued by
IN CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, it is ORDERED that the judgment of the district
court is AFFIRMED IN PART and REVERSED IN PART. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that
the jury’s award is VACATED, and the case is REMANDED for a partial new trial on the
issue of damages.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
Leonard Green, Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?