Brandy Andler v. Clear Channel Broadcasting, In, et al


OPINION and JUDGMENT filed: AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, jury's award is VACATED, case is REMANDED for a partial new trial on the issue of damages; decision for publication pursuant to local rule 206. Boyce F. Martin, Jr., Karen Nelson Moore (AUTHORING), Deborah L. Cook, Circuit Judges. [10-3264, 10-3266]

Download PDF
Case: 10-3264 Document: 006111229308 Filed: 02/29/2012 Page: 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT FILED Nos. 10-3264; 10-3266 Feb 29, 2012 BRANDY ANDLER, Plaintiff - Appellant/Cross-Appellee, LEONARD GREEN, Clerk v. CLEAR CHANNEL BROADCASTING, INC., Defendant - Appellee/Cross-Appellant. Before: MARTIN, MOORE, and COOK, Circuit Judges. JUDGMENT On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio at Columbus. THIS CAUSE was heard on the record from the district court and was argued by counsel. IN CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, it is ORDERED that the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED IN PART and REVERSED IN PART. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the jury’s award is VACATED, and the case is REMANDED for a partial new trial on the issue of damages. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT Leonard Green, Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?