Ann Taylor v. KeyCorp, et al
OPINION and JUDGMENT filed: The judgment of the district court dismissing Taylor's complaint for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction is AFFIRMED. The denial of Lobasso's motion to intervene is AFFIRMED. Decision for publication pursuant to local rule 206. Alan E. Norris, Eric L. Clay, and Richard Allen Griffin (AUTHORING), Circuit Judges. [10-4163, 10-4198, 10-4199]
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
May 25, 2012
LEONARD GREEN, Clerk
ANN I. TAYLOR; ELAINE KLAMERT,
Plaintiffs - Appellants/Cross - Appellees (10-4193/4198),
ANTHONY S. LOBASSO,
Intervenor - Appellant (10-4199),
KEYCORP; THOMAS C. STEVENS; HENRY L.
MEYERS III, KEYCORP TRUST OVERSIGHT
COMMITTEE; JEFFREY B. WEEDEN; THOMAS W.
BUNN; THOMAS E. HELFRICH; ROBERT L. MORRIS,
Defendants - Appellees/Cross - Appellants (10-4193/4198),
Defendants - Appellees (10-4199).
Before: NORRIS, CLAY and GRIFFIN, Circuit Judges.
On Appeals from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Ohio at Cleveland.
THIS CAUSE was heard on the record from the district court and was argued by counsel.
IN CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, it is ORDERED that the judgment of the district court
dismissing Taylor’s complaint for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction is AFFIRMED. IT IS
FURTHER ORDERED that the denial of Lobasso’s motion to intervene is AFFIRMED.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
Leonard Green, Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?