Ahmed Brika v. USA
Filing
Per Curiam OPINION: Because Brika did not establish that he is entitled to a new trial, we AFFIRM the district court's judgment, decision not for publication. Danny J. Boggs, Circuit Judge; David W. McKeague, Circuit Judge and James G. Carr, U.S. District Judge for the Northern District of Ohio, sitting by designation.
Case: 10-4556
Document: 006111546820
Filed: 01/03/2013
Page: 1
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540
POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE
CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988
Deborah S. Hunt
Clerk
Tel. (513) 564-7000
www.ca6.uscourts.gov
Filed: January 03, 2013
Mr. Kevin R. Conners
Mr. Salvador A. Dominguez
Re: Case No. 10-4556, Ahmed Brika v. USA
Originating Case No. : 2:08-CV-877 : 2:01-CR-126-1
Dear Counsel,
The Court issued the enclosed (Order/Opinion) today in this case.
Sincerely yours,
s/Laura A. Jones
Case Manager
Direct Dial No. 513-564-7023
cc: Clerk of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Mr. Kevin Winters Kelley
Enclosure
Mandate to issue
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?