Ahmed Brika v. USA


Per Curiam OPINION: Because Brika did not establish that he is entitled to a new trial, we AFFIRM the district court's judgment, decision not for publication. Danny J. Boggs, Circuit Judge; David W. McKeague, Circuit Judge and James G. Carr, U.S. District Judge for the Northern District of Ohio, sitting by designation.

Download PDF
Case: 10-4556 Document: 006111546820 Filed: 01/03/2013 Page: 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT 100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540 POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988 Deborah S. Hunt Clerk Tel. (513) 564-7000 www.ca6.uscourts.gov Filed: January 03, 2013 Mr. Kevin R. Conners Mr. Salvador A. Dominguez Re: Case No. 10-4556, Ahmed Brika v. USA Originating Case No. : 2:08-CV-877 : 2:01-CR-126-1 Dear Counsel, The Court issued the enclosed (Order/Opinion) today in this case. Sincerely yours, s/Laura A. Jones Case Manager Direct Dial No. 513-564-7023 cc: Clerk of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Mr. Kevin Winters Kelley Enclosure Mandate to issue

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?