John McGlone v. Robert Bell, et al
OPINION and JUDGMENT filed: The district court's finding that Appellant does not have standing to pursue his claim and the district court's grant of Defendants' motion to dismiss are REVERSED. The district court's denial of McGlone's motion for preliminary injunction is VACATED and the case is REMANDED. Decision for publication pursuant to local rule 206. (THIS DECISION WAS ORIGINALLY ISSUED AS AN "UNPUBLISHED DECISION" FILED ON APRIL 23, 2012. ON MAY 16, 2012 THE COURT DESIGNATED THE OPINION AS ONE RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION.) Danny J. Boggs and Eric L. Clay, Circuit Judges; Arthur J. Tarnow (AUTHORING) U.S. District Judge for the Eastern District of Michigan, sitting by designation. [10-6055, 10-6169]
April 23, 2012
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
LEONARD GREEN, Clerk
Plaintiff - Appellant,
ROBERT BELL; ED BOUCHER; MARK
OCHSENBEIN; MICHAEL LAMBERT,
Defendants - Appellees.
Before: BOGGS and CLAY, Circuit Judges; TARNOW, District Judge.
On Appeals from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Tennessee at Cookeville.
THIS CAUSE was heard on the record from the district court and was argued by counsel.
IN CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, it is ORDERED that the district court’s finding that
Appellant does not have standing to pursue his claim and the district court’s grant of Defendants’ motion
to dismiss are REVERSED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the district court’s denial of McGlone’s
motion for preliminary injunction is VACATED and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings
consistent with this opinion.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
Leonard Green, Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?