Randall Waldman, et al v. Ronald Stone
OPINION and JUDGMENT filed: The bankruptcy court's judgment with respect to Stone's disallowance claims is AFFIRMED and the judgment as to his affirmative claims is VACATED. On REMAND the bankruptcy court shall recast its final judgment as to these claims as proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law, which the district court shall review de novo. Decision for publication pursuant to local rule 206. Raymond M. Kethledge (AUTHORING) and Jane Branstetter Stranch, Circuit Judges; and James S. Gwin, U.S. District Judge for the Northern District of Ohio, sitting by designation.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
RANDALL SCOTT WALDMAN; RW LIMITED, CO.;
STONE MACHINE AND FABRICATION, LLC;
INTEGRITY MANUFACTURING, LLC,
Defendants - Appellants,
Oct 26, 2012
DEBORAH S. HUNT, Clerk
RONALD B. STONE,
Plaintiff - Appellee.
Before: KETHLEDGE and STRANCH, Circuit Judges; GWIN, District Judge.
On Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Kentucky at Louisville.
THIS CAUSE was heard on the record from the district court and was argued by counsel.
IN CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, it is ORDERED that the bankruptcy court’s
judgment with respect to Stone’s disallowance claims is AFFIRMED and the judgment as to his
affirmative claims is VACATED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that on remand the bankruptcy
court shall recast its final judgment as to these claims as proposed findings of fact and
conclusions of law, which the district court shall review de novo.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?