Arthur Bell v. Carol Howe


OPINION and JUDGMENT filed: The district court's judgment granting Bell's petition for a writ of habeas corpus is VACATED and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings. Decision for publication. Eugene E. Siler, Jr. and Karen Nelson Moore, Circuit Judges; and Gregory F. Van Tatenhove (AUTHORING), U.S. District Judge for the Eastern District of Kentucky, sitting by designation.

Download PDF
Case: 11-1046 Document: 006111536156 Filed: 12/19/2012 Page: 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT No. 11-1046 FILED Dec 19, 2012 ARTHUR BELL, Petitioner - Appellee, DEBORAH S. HUNT, Clerk v. CAROL HOWES, Warden, Respondent - Appellant. Before: SILER and MOORE, Circuit Judges; VAN TATENHOVE, District Judge. JUDGMENT On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan at Detroit. THIS CAUSE was heard on the record from the district court and was argued by counsel. IN CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, it is ORDERED that the district court’s judgment granting Bell’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus is VACATED, and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with the opinion of this court. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?