Arthur Bell v. Carol Howe

Filing

OPINION and JUDGMENT filed: The district court's judgment granting Bell's petition for a writ of habeas corpus is VACATED and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings. Decision for publication. Eugene E. Siler, Jr. and Karen Nelson Moore, Circuit Judges; and Gregory F. Van Tatenhove (AUTHORING), U.S. District Judge for the Eastern District of Kentucky, sitting by designation.

Case: 11-1046

Document: 006111536156

Filed: 12/19/2012

Page: 1

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-1046

FILED
Dec 19, 2012

ARTHUR BELL,
Petitioner - Appellee,

DEBORAH S. HUNT, Clerk

v.
CAROL HOWES, Warden,
Respondent - Appellant.
Before: SILER and MOORE, Circuit Judges; VAN TATENHOVE, District Judge.
JUDGMENT
On Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Michigan at Detroit.
THIS CAUSE was heard on the record from the district court and was argued by counsel.
IN CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, it is ORDERED that the district court’s judgment
granting Bell’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus is VACATED, and the case is REMANDED
for further proceedings consistent with the opinion of this court.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk