Petroleum Enhancer v. Woodward

Filing

OPINION and JUDGMENT filed: The dismissal of Polar Holding's tortious-interference claim as addressed by the district court is AFFIRMED. The dismissals of Polar Holding's breach-of-fiduciary duty claim against Socia and its civil-conspiracy claim against the individual third-party defendants are REVERSED, and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings on the latter two claims, as well as on Polar Holding's tortious-interference claim not addressed below. Decision for publication pursuant to local rule 206. Boyce F. Martin, Jr., Ronald Lee Gilman (AUTHORING), and Helene N. White, Circuit Judges.

Case: 11-1167

Document: 006111397475

Filed: 08/10/2012

Page: 1

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540
POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE
CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988

Leonard Green
Clerk

Tel. [phone]
www.ca6.uscourts.gov

Filed: August 10, 2012

Mr. John B. Alfs
Clark Hill
151 S. Old Woodward Avenue
Suite 200
Birmingham, MI 48009
Mr. Russell C. Babcock
Mr. Victor Joseph Mastromarco, Jr.
The Mastromarco Firm
1024 N. Michigan Avenue
Saginaw, MI 48602
Re: Case No. 11-1167, Petroleum Enhancer v. Woodward
Originating Case No. : 1:07-CV-12425 : 1:09-CV-10247
Dear Counsel,
The court today announced its decision in the above-styled case.
Enclosed is a copy of the court's opinion together with the judgment which has been entered
in conformity with Rule 36, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.
Yours very truly,
Leonard Green, Clerk
Cathryn Lovely
Deputy Clerk
cc: Mr. David J. Weaver
Enclosures
Mandate to issue.