Joshua Reilly v. Seetha Vadlamudi, et al
OPINION and JUDGMENT filed: The district court's denial of immunity is REVERSED and REMANDED for entry of judgment in favor of Defendants Vadlamudi and Payne. Decision for publication pursuant to local rule 206. Martha Craig Daughtrey and John M. Rogers, Circuit Judges; Jack Zouhary (AUTHORING), U.S. District Judge for the Northern District of Ohio, sitting by designation.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540
POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE
CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988
Tel. (513) 564-7000
Filed: May 25, 2012
Mr. Derek J. Brackon
McKeen & Associates
645 Griswold Street, Suite 4200
Detroit, MI 48226
Mr. Clifton B. Schneider
Office of the Michigan Attorney General
P.O. Box 30217
Lansing, MI 48909
Re: Case No. 11-1252, Joshua Reilly v. Seetha Vadlamudi, et al
Originating Case No. : 2:09-cv-13832
The court today announced its decision in the above-styled case.
Enclosed is a copy of the court's opinion together with the judgment which has been entered
in conformity with Rule 36, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.
Yours very truly,
Leonard Green, Clerk
cc: Mr. David J. Weaver
Mandate to issue.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?