Martinique Stoudemire v. Michigan Department of Correct, et al
Filing
OPINION and JUDGMENT filed : The denial of qualified immunity with respect to Stoudemire's section 1983 conditions of confinement claim against Davis is VACATED and REMANDED to the district court. The denial of qualified immunity with respect to Stoudemire's section 1983 conditions of confinement claim against Dunagan is AFFIRMED. The Defendants' motion regarding governmental immunity defenses under state law is REMANDED to the district court. Decision for publication. Danny J. Boggs and R. Guy Cole , Jr., Circuit Judges; and Solomon Oliver , Jr. (AUTHORING),Chief United States District Judge for the Northern District of Ohio, sitting by designation.
Case: 11-1588
Document: 006111576080
Filed: 01/31/2013
Page: 1
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540
POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE
CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988
Deborah S. Hunt
Clerk
Tel. (513) 564-7000
www.ca6.uscourts.gov
Filed: January 31, 2013
Ms. Elizabeth R. Alexander
American Civil Liberties Union
National Prison Project
915 15th Street, N.W.
7th Floor
Washington, DC 20005-0000
Mr. Clifton B. Schneider
Office of the Michigan Attorney General
P.O. Box 30217
Lansing, MI 48909
Ms. Patricia Annette Streeter
221 N. Main Street
Suite 300
Ann Arbor, MI 48104-0000
Re: Case No. 11-1588, Martinique Stoudemire v. Mich. Dep’t of Corrections, et al.
Originating Case No. : 2:07-cv-15387
Dear Counsel,
The court today announced its decision in the above-styled case.
Enclosed is a copy of the court's opinion together with the judgment which has been entered
in conformity with Rule 36, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.
Yours very truly,
Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk
Case: 11-1588
Document: 006111576080
Filed: 01/31/2013
Cathryn Lovely
Deputy Clerk
cc: Mr. David J. Weaver
Enclosures
Mandate to issue.
Page: 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?