Jesse Peoples v. Blaine Lafler

Filing

OPINION and JUDGMENT filed: The district court's judgment with regard to the ineffective assistance claim is PARTIALLY REVERSED and the case REMANDED with instructions to conditionally GRANT a writ of habeas corpus, giving the State of Michigan ninety days to retry Peoples or release him from custody. The judgment with regard to the insufficiency of the evidence and the ex parte jury instruction claims are AFFIRMED. The prosecutorial misconduct claim is rendered MOOT by our remand. Decision for publication. R. Guy Cole, Jr. and Bernice Bouie Donald (AUTHORING), Circuit Judges; Algenon L. Marbley, U.S. District Judge for the Southern District of Ohio, sitting by designation.

Download PDF
Case: 11-2161 Document: 006111867299 Filed: 10/30/2013 Page: 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT No. 11-2161 FILED JESSE PEOPLES, Petitioner - Appellant, Oct 30, 2013 DEBORAH S. HUNT, Clerk v. BLAINE LAFLER, Warden, Respondent - Appellee. Before: COLE and DONALD, Circuit Judges; MARBLEY, District Judge. JUDGMENT On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan at Detroit. THIS CAUSE was heard on the record from the district court and was argued by counsel. IN CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, it is ORDERED that district court’s judgment with regard to the ineffective assistance claim is PARTIALLY REVERSED and the case is REMANDED with instructions to conditionally GRANT a writ of habeas corpus, giving the State of Michigan ninety days to retry Peoples or release him from custody. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the judgment with regard to the insufficiency of the evidence and the ex parte jury instruction claims are AFFIRMED. The prosecutorial misconduct claim is rendered MOOT by our remand. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?