Richard Zindler v. Dawn Rogers, et al


Per Curiam OPINION filed : We deny the motions for a stay and a preliminary injunction and AFFIRM the district court's judgment, pursuant to rule 34(j)(2)(c), decision not for publication pursuant to local rule 206. Boyce F. Martin , Jr., Circuit Judge; Eric L. Clay, Circuit Judge and Joseph M. Hood, U.S. District Judge for the Eastern District of Kentucky.

Download PDF
Case: 11-2226 Document: 006111340831 Filed: 06/19/2012 Page: 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT 100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540 POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988 Leonard Green Clerk Tel. (513) 564-7000 Filed: June 19, 2012 Mr. Richard Dean Zindler 949 West Edgmont Drive San Bernadino, CA 92405 Re: Case No. 11-2226, Richard Zindler v. Dawn Rogers, et al Originating Case No. : 1:11-CV-770 Dear Mr. Zindler, The Court issued the enclosed (Order/Opinion) today in this case. Sincerely yours, s/Roy G. Ford Case Manager Direct Dial No. 513-564-7016 cc: Ms. Tracey Cordes Mr. Joseph Nimako Enclosure Mandate to issue

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?