Richard Zindler v. Dawn Rogers, et al

Filing

Per Curiam OPINION filed : We deny the motions for a stay and a preliminary injunction and AFFIRM the district court's judgment, pursuant to rule 34(j)(2)(c), decision not for publication pursuant to local rule 206. Boyce F. Martin , Jr., Circuit Judge; Eric L. Clay, Circuit Judge and Joseph M. Hood, U.S. District Judge for the Eastern District of Kentucky.

Case: 11-2226

Document: 006111340831

Filed: 06/19/2012

Page: 1

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540
POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE
CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988

Leonard Green
Clerk

Tel. [phone]
www.ca6.uscourts.gov

Filed: June 19, 2012

Mr. Richard Dean Zindler
949 West Edgmont Drive
San Bernadino, CA 92405
Re: Case No. 11-2226, Richard Zindler v. Dawn Rogers, et al
Originating Case No. : 1:11-CV-770
Dear Mr. Zindler,
The Court issued the enclosed (Order/Opinion) today in this case.
Sincerely yours,
s/Roy G. Ford
Case Manager
Direct Dial No. 513-564-7016
cc: Ms. Tracey Cordes
Mr. Joseph Nimako
Enclosure
Mandate to issue