Sheryl Szeinbach v. OSU
Filing
OPINION filed AFFIRMING the dismissal of Szeinbach s claims, with the exception of her differential-salary-increases and research-misconduct investigation claims, which we REVERSE because she presented sufficient evidence to raise a genuine issue of fact regarding whether she suffered adverse employment actions. On REMAND, the district court may consider the other grounds that OSU advanced in support of summary judgment on these claims including the remaining challenges to the prima facie case and those to the last two steps of the McDonnell Douglas analysis. Decision not for publication pursuant to local rule 206. Helene N. White, Authoring Circuit Judge; Jane Branstetter Stranch, Circuit Judge and Jerome Farris, Circuit Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, sitting by designation.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
