Celeste Thomas v. Anthony Plummer, et al
Filing
OPINION filed : AFFIRMED the district court's denial of Office Plummer's motion to dismiss, however, since every reasonable officer would have known that his tasing Thomas was excessive force as of August 23, 2009, : REVERSED the district court's decision to deny Officer Myers qualified immunity and REMANDED to the district court for proceedings consistent with this opinion, decision not for publication pursuant to local rule 206. Danny J. Boggs, Circuit Judge, Authorizing; Richard Allen Griffin, Circuit Judge and Judith M. Barzilay, International Trade Judge for the United States Court of International Trade. [11-3165, 11-3181]
Case: 11-3165
Document: 006111371648
Filed: 07/17/2012
Page: 1
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
Leonard Green
Clerk
100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540
POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE
CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988
Filed: July 17, 2012
Ms. Elizabeth Conkin
Gonzalez, Saggio & Harlan
One Financial Way
Suite 312
Cincinnati, OH 45242
Mr. Donald E. Hardin
Hardin, Lazarus, Lewis & Marks
30 Garfield Place
Suite 915 Cincinnati Club Building
Cincinnati, OH 45202
Mr. James E. Kolenich
Law Offices
9435 Waterstone Blvd.
Suite 140
Cincinnati, OH 45249-0000
Mr. Cornelius Carl Lewis
Law Office
119 E. Court Street
Cincinnati, OH 45202
Mr. Peter Justin Stackpole
City of Cincinnati
Office of City Solicitor
801 Plum Street
Room 214
Cincinnati, OH 45202
Tel. (513) 564-7000
www.ca6.uscourts.gov
Case: 11-3165
Document: 006111371648
Filed: 07/17/2012
Page: 2
Re: Case No. 11-3165/11-3181, Celeste Thomas v. Anthony Plummer, et al
Originating Case No. : 1:09-CV-948
Dear Sir or Madam,
The Court issued the enclosed (Order/Opinion) today in this case.
Sincerely yours,
s/Florence P. Ebert
Case Manager
Direct Dial No. 513-564-7026
cc:
Clerk of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Enclosure
Mandate to issue
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?