Celeste Thomas v. Anthony Plummer, et al


OPINION filed : AFFIRMED the district court's denial of Office Plummer's motion to dismiss, however, since every reasonable officer would have known that his tasing Thomas was excessive force as of August 23, 2009, : REVERSED the district court's decision to deny Officer Myers qualified immunity and REMANDED to the district court for proceedings consistent with this opinion, decision not for publication pursuant to local rule 206. Danny J. Boggs, Circuit Judge, Authorizing; Richard Allen Griffin, Circuit Judge and Judith M. Barzilay, International Trade Judge for the United States Court of International Trade. [11-3165, 11-3181]

Download PDF
Case: 11-3165 Document: 006111371648 Filed: 07/17/2012 Page: 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT Leonard Green Clerk 100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540 POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988 Filed: July 17, 2012 Ms. Elizabeth Conkin Gonzalez, Saggio & Harlan One Financial Way Suite 312 Cincinnati, OH 45242 Mr. Donald E. Hardin Hardin, Lazarus, Lewis & Marks 30 Garfield Place Suite 915 Cincinnati Club Building Cincinnati, OH 45202 Mr. James E. Kolenich Law Offices 9435 Waterstone Blvd. Suite 140 Cincinnati, OH 45249-0000 Mr. Cornelius Carl Lewis Law Office 119 E. Court Street Cincinnati, OH 45202 Mr. Peter Justin Stackpole City of Cincinnati Office of City Solicitor 801 Plum Street Room 214 Cincinnati, OH 45202 Tel. (513) 564-7000 www.ca6.uscourts.gov Case: 11-3165 Document: 006111371648 Filed: 07/17/2012 Page: 2 Re: Case No. 11-3165/11-3181, Celeste Thomas v. Anthony Plummer, et al Originating Case No. : 1:09-CV-948 Dear Sir or Madam, The Court issued the enclosed (Order/Opinion) today in this case. Sincerely yours, s/Florence P. Ebert Case Manager Direct Dial No. 513-564-7026 cc: Clerk of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Enclosure Mandate to issue

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?