Rayco Manufacturing, Inc., et al v. Deutz Corporation, et al


Per Curiam OPINION filed: we AFFIRM the district court decisions. In view of our disposition, we DISMISS Deutz's contingent cross-appeal as moot. Jeffrey S. Sutton, Circuit Judge; Richard Allen Griffin, Circuit Judge and Joseph M. Hood, U.S. District Judge for the Eastern District of Kentucky, sitting by designation. [11-3639, 11-3713]

Download PDF
Case: 11-3639 Document: 006111417455 Filed: 08/29/2012 Page: 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT 100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540 POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988 Leonard Green Clerk Tel. (513) 564-7000 www.ca6.uscourts.gov Filed: August 29, 2012 Mr. Richard J. Bedell Jr. Mr. Peter Brooks Sloss Re: Case No. 11-3639/11-3713, Rayco Manufacturing, Inc., et al v. Deutz Corporation, et al Originating Case No. : 5:08-CV-74 Dear Counsel, The Court issued the enclosed (Order/Opinion) today in this case. Sincerely yours, s/Laura A. Jones Case Manager Direct Dial No. 513-564-7023 cc: Mr. Michael Charles Cohan Mr. Douglas A. DiPalma Mr. Gary J. Gambel Mr. John Q. Lewis Mr. Christopher M. McLaughlin Mr. Robert H. Murphy Ms. Geri M. Smith Enclosure Mandate to issue

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?