Rayco Manufacturing, Inc., et al v. Deutz Corporation, et al
Filing
Per Curiam OPINION filed: we AFFIRM the district court decisions. In view of our disposition, we DISMISS Deutz's contingent cross-appeal as moot. Jeffrey S. Sutton, Circuit Judge; Richard Allen Griffin, Circuit Judge and Joseph M. Hood, U.S. District Judge for the Eastern District of Kentucky, sitting by designation. [11-3639, 11-3713]
Case: 11-3639
Document: 006111417455
Filed: 08/29/2012
Page: 1
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540
POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE
CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988
Leonard Green
Clerk
Tel. (513) 564-7000
www.ca6.uscourts.gov
Filed: August 29, 2012
Mr. Richard J. Bedell Jr.
Mr. Peter Brooks Sloss
Re: Case No. 11-3639/11-3713, Rayco Manufacturing, Inc., et al v. Deutz Corporation, et al
Originating Case No. : 5:08-CV-74
Dear Counsel,
The Court issued the enclosed (Order/Opinion) today in this case.
Sincerely yours,
s/Laura A. Jones
Case Manager
Direct Dial No. 513-564-7023
cc: Mr. Michael Charles Cohan
Mr. Douglas A. DiPalma
Mr. Gary J. Gambel
Mr. John Q. Lewis
Mr. Christopher M. McLaughlin
Mr. Robert H. Murphy
Ms. Geri M. Smith
Enclosure
Mandate to issue
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?