Daniel Greenberg v. Procter & Gamble Company, et al
Filing
OPINION and JUDGMENT filed: The judgment of the district court is REVERSED, and the case REMANDED. Decision for publication. R. Guy Cole , Jr. (DISSENTING) and Raymond M. Kethledge (AUTHORING), Circuit Judges; and Amul R. Thapar, U.S. District Judge for the Eastern District of Kentucky, sitting by designation.
Case: 11-4156
Document: 006111772736
Filed: 08/02/2013
Page: 1
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-4156
IN RE: DRY MAX PAMPERS LITIGATION.
_____________________________________
FILED
Aug 02, 2013
DEBORAH S. HUNT, Clerk
DANIEL GREENBERG,
Objector - Appellant,
ANGELA CLARK, et al.,
Plaintiffs - Appellees,
v.
PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY; PROCTER & GAMBLE
PAPER PRODUCTS COMPANY; PROCTER & GAMBLE
DISTRIBUTING LLC,
Defendants - Appellees.
Before: COLE and KETHLEDGE, Circuit Judges; and THAPAR, District Judge.
JUDGMENT
On Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Ohio at Cincinnati.
THIS CAUSE was heard on the record from the district court and was argued by counsel.
IN CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, it is ORDERED that the judgment of the district court is
REVERSED, and the case REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with the opinion of this
court.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?