Daniel Greenberg v. Procter & Gamble Company, et al


OPINION and JUDGMENT filed: The judgment of the district court is REVERSED, and the case REMANDED. Decision for publication. R. Guy Cole , Jr. (DISSENTING) and Raymond M. Kethledge (AUTHORING), Circuit Judges; and Amul R. Thapar, U.S. District Judge for the Eastern District of Kentucky, sitting by designation.

Download PDF
Case: 11-4156 Document: 006111772736 Filed: 08/02/2013 Page: 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT No. 11-4156 IN RE: DRY MAX PAMPERS LITIGATION. _____________________________________ FILED Aug 02, 2013 DEBORAH S. HUNT, Clerk DANIEL GREENBERG, Objector - Appellant, ANGELA CLARK, et al., Plaintiffs - Appellees, v. PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY; PROCTER & GAMBLE PAPER PRODUCTS COMPANY; PROCTER & GAMBLE DISTRIBUTING LLC, Defendants - Appellees. Before: COLE and KETHLEDGE, Circuit Judges; and THAPAR, District Judge. JUDGMENT On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio at Cincinnati. THIS CAUSE was heard on the record from the district court and was argued by counsel. IN CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, it is ORDERED that the judgment of the district court is REVERSED, and the case REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with the opinion of this court. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?