Daniel Greenberg v. Procter & Gamble Company, et al
OPINION and JUDGMENT filed: The judgment of the district court is REVERSED, and the case REMANDED. Decision for publication. R. Guy Cole , Jr. (DISSENTING) and Raymond M. Kethledge (AUTHORING), Circuit Judges; and Amul R. Thapar, U.S. District Judge for the Eastern District of Kentucky, sitting by designation.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
IN RE: DRY MAX PAMPERS LITIGATION.
Aug 02, 2013
DEBORAH S. HUNT, Clerk
Objector - Appellant,
ANGELA CLARK, et al.,
Plaintiffs - Appellees,
PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY; PROCTER & GAMBLE
PAPER PRODUCTS COMPANY; PROCTER & GAMBLE
Defendants - Appellees.
Before: COLE and KETHLEDGE, Circuit Judges; and THAPAR, District Judge.
On Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Ohio at Cincinnati.
THIS CAUSE was heard on the record from the district court and was argued by counsel.
IN CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, it is ORDERED that the judgment of the district court is
REVERSED, and the case REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with the opinion of this
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?