Rick Cotton v. City of Franklin
Filing
Per Curiam OPINION filed : The district court's denial of Cotton's motion for a new trial is AFFIRMED, decision not for publication pursuant to local rule 206. John M. Rogers, Circuit Judge; Jane Branstetter Stranch, Circuit Judge and Benita Y. Pearson, U.S. District Judge for the Northern District of Ohio.
Case: 11-5003
Document: 006111400150
Filed: 08/14/2012
Page: 1
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
Leonard Green
Clerk
100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540
POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE
CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988
Filed: August 14, 2012
Mr. Andy L. Allman
Law Offices
103 Bluegrass Commons Boulevard
Hendersonville, TN 37075
Mr. William Nelson Bates
Farrar & Bates
211 Seventh Avenue, N.
Suite 500
Nashville, TN 37219
Re: Case No. 11-5003, Rick Cotton v. City of Franklin
Originating Case No. : 3:09-CV-215
Dear Sir or Madam,
The Court issued the enclosed (Order/Opinion) today in this case.
Sincerely yours,
s/Cheryl Borkowski for Linda Niesen
Case Manager
Direct Dial No. 513-564-7035
cc: Mr. Keith Throckmorton
Enclosure
Mandate to issue
Tel. (513) 564-7000
www.ca6.uscourts.gov
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?