Rick Cotton v. City of Franklin


Per Curiam OPINION filed : The district court's denial of Cotton's motion for a new trial is AFFIRMED, decision not for publication pursuant to local rule 206. John M. Rogers, Circuit Judge; Jane Branstetter Stranch, Circuit Judge and Benita Y. Pearson, U.S. District Judge for the Northern District of Ohio.

Download PDF
Case: 11-5003 Document: 006111400150 Filed: 08/14/2012 Page: 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT Leonard Green Clerk 100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540 POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988 Filed: August 14, 2012 Mr. Andy L. Allman Law Offices 103 Bluegrass Commons Boulevard Hendersonville, TN 37075 Mr. William Nelson Bates Farrar & Bates 211 Seventh Avenue, N. Suite 500 Nashville, TN 37219 Re: Case No. 11-5003, Rick Cotton v. City of Franklin Originating Case No. : 3:09-CV-215 Dear Sir or Madam, The Court issued the enclosed (Order/Opinion) today in this case. Sincerely yours, s/Cheryl Borkowski for Linda Niesen Case Manager Direct Dial No. 513-564-7035 cc: Mr. Keith Throckmorton Enclosure Mandate to issue Tel. (513) 564-7000 www.ca6.uscourts.gov

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?