Bridgett Handy-Clay v. City of Memphis, Tennessee, et al


OPINION and JUDGMENT filed: The portion of the district court's judgment dismissing Handy-Clay's retaliation claim is REVERSED, and the caes is REMANDED. The remainder of the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED. Decision for publication pursuant to local rule 206. Martha Craig Daughtrey (AUTHORING) and Eric L. Clay, Circuit Judges; and Robert H. Cleland, U.S. District Judge for the Eastern District of Michigan, sitting by designation.

Download PDF
Case: 11-5518 Document: 006111444343 Filed: 09/25/2012 Page: 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT No. 11-5518 FILED Sep 25, 2012 BRIDGETT HANDY-CLAY, Plaintiff - Appellant, DEBORAH S. HUNT, Clerk v. CITY OF MEMPHIS, TENNESSEE; MAYOR AC WHARTON, in his official capacity; HERMAN MORRIS, JR., individually and in his official capacity as City Attorney; CATHY PORTER, individually and in her official capacity as Senior Legal Administrator, Defendants - Appellees. Before: DAUGHTREY and CLAY, Circuit Judges; CLELAND, District Judge. JUDGMENT On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee at Memphis. THIS CAUSE was heard on the record from the district court and was argued by counsel. IN CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, it is ORDERED that the portion of the district court’s judgment dismissing Handy-Clay’s retaliation claim is REVERSED, and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the remainder of the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?