Bridgett Handy-Clay v. City of Memphis, Tennessee, et al

Filing

OPINION and JUDGMENT filed: The portion of the district court's judgment dismissing Handy-Clay's retaliation claim is REVERSED, and the caes is REMANDED. The remainder of the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED. Decision for publication pursuant to local rule 206. Martha Craig Daughtrey (AUTHORING) and Eric L. Clay, Circuit Judges; and Robert H. Cleland, U.S. District Judge for the Eastern District of Michigan, sitting by designation.

Case: 11-5518

Document: 006111444343

Filed: 09/25/2012

Page: 1

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-5518

FILED
Sep 25, 2012

BRIDGETT HANDY-CLAY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,

DEBORAH S. HUNT, Clerk

v.
CITY OF MEMPHIS, TENNESSEE; MAYOR
AC WHARTON, in his official capacity; HERMAN
MORRIS, JR., individually and in his official capacity as
City Attorney; CATHY PORTER, individually and
in her official capacity as Senior Legal Administrator,
Defendants - Appellees.
Before: DAUGHTREY and CLAY, Circuit Judges; CLELAND, District Judge.
JUDGMENT
On Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Tennessee at Memphis.
THIS CAUSE was heard on the record from the district court and was argued by counsel.
IN CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, it is ORDERED that the portion of the district
court’s judgment dismissing Handy-Clay’s retaliation claim is REVERSED, and the case is
REMANDED for further proceedings. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the remainder of the
district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk