Bridgett Handy-Clay v. City of Memphis, Tennessee, et al

Filing

OPINION and JUDGMENT filed: The portion of the district court's judgment dismissing Handy-Clay's retaliation claim is REVERSED, and the caes is REMANDED. The remainder of the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED. Decision for publication pursuant to local rule 206. Martha Craig Daughtrey (AUTHORING) and Eric L. Clay, Circuit Judges; and Robert H. Cleland, U.S. District Judge for the Eastern District of Michigan, sitting by designation.

Case: 11-5518

Document: 006111444344

Filed: 09/25/2012

Page: 1

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540
POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE
CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988

Deborah S. Hunt
Clerk

Tel. [phone]
www.ca6.uscourts.gov

Filed: September 25, 2012
Mr. Donald Alfred Donati
Mr. Bryce W. Ashby
Mr. William Benjamin Ryan
Donati Law Firm
1545 Union Avenue
Memphis, TN 38104
Ms. Carolyn Jean Chumney
5050 Poplar, Suite 2400
Memphis, TN 38157-0000
Mr. J. Michael Fletcher
2157 Madison Avenue, Suite 202
Memphis, TN 38104
Mr. Elijah Noel Jr.
Harris, Shelton, Hanover & Walsh
One Commerce Square, Suite 2700
Memphis, TN 38103

Re: Case No. 11-5518, Bridgett Handy-Clay v. City of Memphis, Tennessee, et al
Originating Case No. : 2:10-cv-2927
Dear Counsel,
The court today announced its decision in the above-styled case.
Enclosed is a copy of the court's opinion together with the judgment which has been entered
in conformity with Rule 36, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.
Yours very truly,
Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk

Case: 11-5518

Document: 006111444344

Filed: 09/25/2012

Cathryn Lovely
Deputy Clerk
cc: Mr. Thomas M. Gould
Enclosures
Mandate to issue.

Page: 2