USA, et al v. Renal Care Group, Inc., et al
OPINION and JUDGMENT filed: District Court's judgments as to Counts One and Two are REVERSED, and the defendants' motion for summary judgment as to those counts is GRANTED. It is further ordered that the district court's judgments as to all remaining counts are REVERSED and REMANDED, but that defendants' motion for reassignment is DENIED, decision for publication pursuant to local rule 206. R. Guy Cole , Jr. (AUTHORING); Deborah L. Cook, Circuit Judges and Gerald E. Rosen (CONCURRING), Chief District Judge for the E. D. of MI.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
Oct 05, 2012
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex rel. JULIE
Plaintiffs - Appellees,
DEBORAH S. HUNT, Clerk
JOHN MARTINEZ, M.D.,
RENAL CARE GROUP, INC.; RENAL CARE
GROUP SUPPLY COMPANY; FRESENIUS
MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, INC.,
Defendants - Appellants.
Before: COLE and COOK, Circuit Judges; ROSEN, Chief District Judge.
On Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Tennessee at Nashville.
THIS CAUSE was heard on the record from the district court and was argued by counsel.
IN CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, it is ORDERED that the district court’s judgments as to
Counts One and Two are REVERSED, and the defendants’ motion for summary judgment as to those
counts is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the district court’s judgments as to all
remaining counts are REVERSED AND REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with the
opinion of this court, but that defendants’ motion for reassignment is DENIED.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?