Conny Moritz v. Blaine Lafler

Filing

OPINION filed: REVERSED and REMANDED. We REVERSE the decision of the district court. Because the district court, having granted Moritz s choice-of-counsel claim, considered it unnecessary to review his other claims and declined to do so, we REMAND Moritz s petition to the district court with instructions to issue a ruling on Moritz s remaining grounds for relief.decision not for publication. Danny J. Boggs, Authoring Circuit Judge; David W. McKeague, Circuit Judge and James G. Carr, Senior U.S. District Judge for the Northern District of Ohio, sitting by designation.

Download PDF
Case: 12-1222 Document: 006111670067 Filed: 04/25/2013 Page: 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT 100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540 POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988 Deborah S. Hunt Clerk Tel. (513) 564-7000 www.ca6.uscourts.gov Filed: April 25, 2013 Ms. Andrea Marion Christensen Office of the Michigan Attorney General 525 W. Ottawa Street Lansing, MI 48909 Mr. Bradley R. Hall Legal Aid & Defender Association 613 Abbott Street Fifth Floor Detroit, MI 48226 Mr. Andrew N. Wise Legal Aid & Defender Association 613 Abbott Street Fifth Floor Detroit, MI 48226 Re: Case No. 12-1222, Conny Moritz v. Blaine Lafler Originating Case No. : 2:07-CV-15369 Dear Counsel: The Court issued the enclosed (Order/Opinion) today in this case. Sincerely yours, s/Benjamin P. Alexander Case Manager Direct Dial No. 513-564-7021 cc: Mr. David J. Weaver Enclosure Mandate to issue

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?