Michael Gresham v. Violetta, et al
Per Curiam OPINION filed the appeal is dismissed. Boyce F. Martin , Jr., Circuit Judge; Eric L. Clay, Circuit Judge and Joseph M. Hood, U.S. District Judge for the Eastern District of Kentucky. (2 pages)
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
UNKNOWN VIOLETTA, RUO, et al.,
Jun 12, 2012
LEONARD GREEN, Clerk
Before: MARTIN and CLAY, Circuit Judges; HOOD, District Judge.*
PER CURIAM. This matter is before the court upon consideration of Michael Gresham’s
response to our order directing him to show cause why his appeal should not be dismissed on the
basis of a late notice of appeal. Gresham responded by stating: (1) that he mailed a notice of appeal
to the district court on March 2, 2012, but the district court rejected it; and (2) that prior to the March
2, 2012 mailing, he filed a notice of appeal on February 14, 2012, but prison officials may have
The record indicates that the district court entered its order on February 6, 2012, denying
Gresham leave to proceed in forma pauperis in the district court. The notice of appeal filed on
March 19, 2012 is late. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a) and 26(a). There is no indication on the district
court docket report that the notice of appeal Gresham allegedly mailed on March 2, 2012 was
rejected. Further, there is no evidence of a February 14, 2012 notice.
Compliance with Rule 4(a) is a mandatory prerequisite that we may neither waive nor extend.
Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007); Ultimate Appliance CC v. Kirby Co., 601 F.3d 414,
The Honorable Joseph M. Hood, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of
Kentucky, sitting by designation.
-2415–16 (6th Cir. 2010). Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 26(b) specifically provides that we
may not enlarge the time for filing a notice of appeal except as authorized in Rule 4.
The appeal is dismissed.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?