Yaldo, et al v. Doe, et al


Per Curiam OPINION: we therefore VACATE the district court's judgment to the extent that it dismissed the Trustee's claims, Dr. Yaldo's post-petition and injunctive-relief claims, and DHE's claims, and REMAND for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. We DENY the parties' appellate motions as MOOT, decision not for publication. Boyce F. Martin , Jr., Circuit Judge; Deborah L. Cook, Circuit Judge and James L. Graham, U.S. District Judge for the Southern District of Ohio, sitting by designation.

Download PDF
Case: 12-1840 Document: 006111734859 Filed: 06/26/2013 Page: 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT 100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540 POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988 Deborah S. Hunt Clerk Tel. (513) 564-7000 www.ca6.uscourts.gov Filed: June 26, 2013 Mr. Mitchell M Musial II Mr. Wiliam Daniel Troyka Re: Case No. 12-1840, Yaldo, et al v. Doe, et al Originating Case No. : 5:10-cv-11886 Dear Counsel, The Court issued the enclosed (Order/Opinion) today in this case. Sincerely yours, s/Laura A. Jones Case Manager Direct Dial No. 513-564-7023 cc: Mr. Hattem A. Beydoun Ms. Joy M. Glovick Mr. David J. Weaver Enclosure Mandate to issue

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?