Candido Romo v. Jeff Largen
OPINION and JUDGMENT filed : The district court's denial of qualified immunity with respect to Romo's fedearl malicious-prosecution claim is REVERSED, and the judgment of the district court is otherwise AFFIRMED. Decision for publication. Ronald Lee Gilman, John M. Rogers (AUTHORING), and Jeffrey S. Sutton (CONCURRING IN PART AND IN THE JUDGMENT), Circuit Judges.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540
POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE
CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988
Deborah S. Hunt
Tel. (513) 564-7000
Filed: July 23, 2013
Mr. William Frank Piper II
1611 W. Centre Avenue, Suite 209
Portage, MI 49024
Ms. Mary Massaron Ross
38505 Woodward Avenue, Suite 2000
Bloomfield Hills, MI 48304
Re: Case No. 12-1870, Candido Romo v. Jeff Largen
Originating Case No. : 1:11-cv-00624
The court today announced its decision in the above-styled case.
Enclosed is a copy of the court's opinion together with the judgment which has been entered
in conformity with Rule 36, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.
Yours very truly,
Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk
cc: Ms. Tracey Cordes
Mandate to issue.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?