Candido Romo v. Jeff Largen


OPINION and JUDGMENT filed : The district court's denial of qualified immunity with respect to Romo's fedearl malicious-prosecution claim is REVERSED, and the judgment of the district court is otherwise AFFIRMED. Decision for publication. Ronald Lee Gilman, John M. Rogers (AUTHORING), and Jeffrey S. Sutton (CONCURRING IN PART AND IN THE JUDGMENT), Circuit Judges.

Download PDF
Case: 12-1870 Document: 006111761418 Filed: 07/23/2013 Page: 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT 100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540 POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988 Deborah S. Hunt Clerk Tel. (513) 564-7000 Filed: July 23, 2013 Mr. William Frank Piper II 1611 W. Centre Avenue, Suite 209 Portage, MI 49024 Ms. Mary Massaron Ross Plunkett Cooney 38505 Woodward Avenue, Suite 2000 Bloomfield Hills, MI 48304 Re: Case No. 12-1870, Candido Romo v. Jeff Largen Originating Case No. : 1:11-cv-00624 Dear Counsel, The court today announced its decision in the above-styled case. Enclosed is a copy of the court's opinion together with the judgment which has been entered in conformity with Rule 36, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Yours very truly, Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk Cathryn Lovely Deputy Clerk cc: Ms. Tracey Cordes Enclosures Mandate to issue.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?