Daniel Corral v. USA

Filing

OPINION filed : We AFFIRM the district court s holdings that Corral procedurally defaulted his claims of defective sentencing and prosecutorial vindictiveness, as well as its finding that Corral was not denied effective assistance of counsel when his trial counsel failed to file a motion for change of venue. We REVERSE the district court s decision not to hold an evidentiary hearing, finding that the evidence does not conclusively show that Corral is entitled to no relief, and REMAND for an evidentiary hearing as to his double jeopardy claim and the corresponding ineffective assistance of counsel claim. Decision not for publication. Eugene E. Siler , Jr., Circuit Judge; R. Guy Cole , Jr., Circuit Judge and Deborah L. Cook, Circuit Judge.

Download PDF
Case: 12-1897 Document: 61-1 Filed: 04/09/2014 Page: 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT 100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540 POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988 Deborah S. Hunt Clerk Tel. (513) 564-7000 www.ca6.uscourts.gov Filed: April 09, 2014 Mr. Frank D. Eaman Law Office 645 Griswold Street Suite 3060 Detroit, MI 48226 Ms. Margaret Marie Smith U.S. Attorney's Office 211 W. Fort Street Suite 2001 Detroit, MI 48226 Re: Case No. 12-1897, Daniel Corral v. USA Originating Case No. : 2:06-cr-20663-18 Dear Counsel: The Court issued the enclosed Opinion today in this case. Sincerely yours, s/Karen S. Fultz Case Manager Direct Dial No. 513-564-7036 cc: Mr. David J. Weaver Enclosure Mandate to issue

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?