Autocam Corporation, et al v. Kathleen Sebelius, et al
OPINION and JUDGMENT filed: The district court's denial of Autocam's motion for preliminary injunction is AFFIRMED, and the case is REMANDED with instructions to dismiss the Kennedys' Religious Freedom Restoration Act claim due to lack of jurisdiction. Decision for publication. Julia Smith Gibbons (AUTHORING) and Jane Branstetter Stranch, Circuit Judges; Denise Page Hood, U.S. District Judge for the Eastern District of Michigan, sitting by designation.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
AUTOCAM CORPORATION; AUTOCAM
MEDICAL, LLC; JOHN KENNEDY; PAUL
KENNEDY; JOHN KENNEDY IV; MARGARET
KENNEDY; THOMAS KENNEDY,
Sep 17, 2013
DEBORAH S. HUNT, Clerk
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, in her official capacity as
Secretary of Health and Human Services; UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES;
THOMAS E. PEREZ, in his official capacity as Secretary of Labor;
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR; JACOB LEW,
in his official capacity as Secretary of the Treasury; UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY,
Before: GIBBONS and STRANCH, Circuit Judges; HOOD, District Judge.
On Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Michigan at Grand Rapids.
THIS CAUSE was heard on the record from the district court and was argued by counsel.
IN CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, it is ORDERED that the district court’s denial of Autocam’s
motion for preliminary injunction is AFFIRMED, and the case is REMANDED to the district court with
instructions to dismiss the Kennedys’ Religious Freedom Restoration Act claims due to a lack of
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?