Autocam Corporation, et al v. Kathleen Sebelius, et al

Filing

OPINION and JUDGMENT filed: The district court's denial of Autocam's motion for preliminary injunction is AFFIRMED, and the case is REMANDED with instructions to dismiss the Kennedys' Religious Freedom Restoration Act claim due to lack of jurisdiction. Decision for publication. Julia Smith Gibbons (AUTHORING) and Jane Branstetter Stranch, Circuit Judges; Denise Page Hood, U.S. District Judge for the Eastern District of Michigan, sitting by designation.

Download PDF
Case: 12-2673 Document: 006111820550 Filed: 09/17/2013 Page: 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT No. 12-2673 AUTOCAM CORPORATION; AUTOCAM MEDICAL, LLC; JOHN KENNEDY; PAUL KENNEDY; JOHN KENNEDY IV; MARGARET KENNEDY; THOMAS KENNEDY, Plaintiffs-Appellants, FILED Sep 17, 2013 DEBORAH S. HUNT, Clerk v. KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, in her official capacity as Secretary of Health and Human Services; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES; THOMAS E. PEREZ, in his official capacity as Secretary of Labor; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR; JACOB LEW, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Treasury; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, Defendants-Appellees. Before: GIBBONS and STRANCH, Circuit Judges; HOOD, District Judge. JUDGMENT On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan at Grand Rapids. THIS CAUSE was heard on the record from the district court and was argued by counsel. IN CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, it is ORDERED that the district court’s denial of Autocam’s motion for preliminary injunction is AFFIRMED, and the case is REMANDED to the district court with instructions to dismiss the Kennedys’ Religious Freedom Restoration Act claims due to a lack of jurisdiction. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?