Carmella Amick, et al v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitat, et al


OPINION filed : AFFIRMED in part and VACATED in part. For the reasons discussed above, the dismissal of plaintiffs claim for deliberate indifference to serious medical needs is AFFIRMED, as is the dismissal of plaintiffs claim that such deliberate indifference was pursuant to a policy or custom of inadequate training and supervision. However, the dismissal of plaintiffs claim against defendants Andrei Jackson, Willie Ford, Harry Wright, Jerry Gianangeli, Joseph Underwood, and Ricky Drake, for deliberate indifference to Amick s need for protection from the risk of violence, is VACATED and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings; decision not for publication. Martha Craig Daughtrey, David W. McKeague (Authoring) and Richard Allen Griffin, Circuit Judges.

Download PDF
Case: 12-3515 Document: 006111634689 Filed: 03/27/2013 Page: 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT 100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540 POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988 Deborah S. Hunt Clerk Tel. (513) 564-7000 Filed: March 27, 2013 Mr. Brian Andrew Murray Zukerman, Daiker & Lear 3912 Prospect Avenue, E. Cleveland, OH 44115 Ms. Debra Gorrell Wehrle Office of the Ohio Attorney General 150 E. Gay Street 16th Floor Columbus, OH 43215 Re: Case No. 12-3515, Carmella Amick, et al v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitat, et al Originating Case No. : 2:09-cv-00812 Dear Sir or Madam, The Court issued the enclosed Opinion today in this case. Sincerely yours, s/Louise Schwarber Case Manager Direct Dial No. 513-564-7015 cc: John P. Hehman Enclosure Mandate to issue

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?