Groeneveld Transport Efficienc v. Lubecore International, Inc.

Filing

OPINION and JUDGMENT filed: The district court's order denying Lubecore's Rule 50 motion with respect to Groeneveld's trade-dress claim is REVERSED, the dismissal of Groeneveld's other claims is AFFIRMED, and the case is REMANDED with instructions to enter judgment as a matter of law in favor of Lubecore on all claims. Decision for publication. Ronald Lee Gilman (AUTHORING), Richard Allen Griffin, and Helene N. White (DISSENTING), Circuit Judges. [12-3545, 12-3576]

Case: 12-3545

Document: 006111816015

Filed: 09/12/2013

Page: 1

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540
POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE
CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988

Deborah S. Hunt
Clerk

Tel. [phone]
www.ca6.uscourts.gov

Filed: September 12, 2013
Mr. Thomas Leo Anastos
Ms. Jill Yutzy Coen
Ms. Melissa Lynn Zujkowski
Ulmer & Berne
1660 W. Second Street, Suite 1100
Cleveland, OH 44113
Mr. Kenneth Germain
Wood, Herron & Evans
441 Vine Street, Suite 2700
Cincinnati, OH 45202
Mr. David Andrew Kunselman
Ms. Deborah J. Michelson
Mr. Steven J. Miller
Miller Goler Faeges
100 Erieview Plaza, 27th Floor
Cleveland, OH 44114
Re: Case Nos. 12-3545/3576, Groeneveld Transport v. Lubecore Int’l, Inc.
Originating Case No. : 1:10-cv-00702
Dear Counsel,
The court today announced its decision in the above-styled cases.
Enclosed is a copy of the court's opinion together with the judgment which has been entered
in conformity with Rule 36, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.
Yours very truly,
Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk

Case: 12-3545

Document: 006111816015

Filed: 09/12/2013

Cathryn Lovely
Deputy Clerk
cc: Geri M. Smith
Enclosures
Mandate to issue.

Page: 2