USA v. Dazzle Young


OPINION: the government did not violate defendant's constitutional rights by withholding evidence in violation of its rule 16 discovery obligations. Young's request for a remand is therefore DENIED. In addition, the district court's decisions denying defendant's motion for acquittal under Rule 29 and motion for new trial pursuant to Rule 33 are AFFIRMED, decision not for publication. Danny J. Boggs, Circuit Judge; John M. Rogers, Circuit Judge and George C. Steeh, AUTHORING U.S. District Judge for the Eastern District of Michigan, sitting by designation.

Download PDF
Case: 12-3645 Document: 006111952513 Filed: 01/31/2014 Page: 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT 100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540 POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988 Deborah S. Hunt Clerk Tel. (513) 564-7000 Filed: January 31, 2014 Mr. Jeffrey B Lazarus Mr. Daniel R. Ranke Re: Case No. 12-3645, USA v. Dazzle Young Originating Case No. : 5:11-cr-00328-1 Dear Counsel, The Court issued the enclosed (Order/Opinion) today in this case. Sincerely yours, s/Laura A. Jones Case Manager Direct Dial No. 513-564-7023 cc: Ms. Geri M. Smith Enclosure Mandate to issue

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?