USA v. Dwayne Moody


OPINION: Because Moody's "applicable guideline range" was the mandatory minimum, it was not reduced by Amendment 750, and the district court was correct to find him ineligible for a sentence reduction. We therefore AFFIRM the district court's order, decision not for publication. Martha Craig Daughtrey, Circuit Judge; John M. Rogers, Circuit Judge and David W. McKeague, AUTHORING Circuit Judge.

Download PDF
Case: 12-3924 Document: 006111690956 Filed: 05/15/2013 Page: 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT 100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540 POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988 Deborah S. Hunt Clerk Tel. (513) 564-7000 Filed: May 15, 2013 Mr. Edward F. Feran Mr. Jeffrey B Lazarus Re: Case No. 12-3924, USA v. Dwayne Moody Originating Case No. : 4:08-cr-00059-1 Dear Counsel, The Court issued the enclosed (Order/Opinion) today in this case. Sincerely yours, s/Laura A. Jones Case Manager Direct Dial No. 513-564-7023 cc: Ms. Geri M. Smith Enclosure Mandate to issue

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?