Karen Auday v. Wet Seal Retail, Inc.
OPINION and JUDGMENT filed: The judgment is VACATED, and the case is REMANDED to the district court for the purpose of dismissing the case without prejudice or of allowing Auday to amend the complaint to substitute the Trustee as the plaintiff. Decision for publication pursuant to local rule 206. Jeffrey S. Sutton (AUTHORING), Richard Allen Griffin, and Helene N. White, Circuit Judges.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
Oct 25, 2012
DEBORAH S. HUNT, Clerk
Plaintiff - Appellant,
WET SEAL RETAIL, INC.,
Defendant - Appellee.
Before: SUTTON, GRIFFIN and WHITE, Circuit Judges.
On Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Tennessee at Chattanooga.
THIS CAUSE was heard on the record from the district court and was argued by
IN CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, it is ORDERED that the judgment is
VACATED, and the case is REMANDED to the district court for the purpose either of
dismissing the case without prejudice or of allowing Auday to amend the complaint to
substitute the Trustee as the plaintiff.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?